Mortgage Insurance Premium Fha
FHA Loans-Affordability Solutions for home buyers
"FHA" and "first-time buyers" slogans are real as far as home buying is concerned, especially when these terms are used in combination. Many readers have heard of "ready FHA buyers are perfect for a first "language of the street, but without details, supporting information to explain why.
The aim of this paper is to quantify the characteristics of the loan, both good and bad, and discuss the circumstances in which it is a program beneficial to home ownership (either first, second or third home ownership).
First, the FHA stands for Federal Housing Authority, and although the phrase "FHA loan" implies otherwise, the Federal Housing Authority does not lend money. Rather, they insure the loan. The money always comes from the lender selected by the borrower, but the FHA now provides an insurance policy to protect the lender if the borrower defaults. With this insurance, the lender has less risk, and so guidelines are less restrictive than conventional financing.
The reader should be aware that FHA is completely different from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (otherwise known as GSEs, or "government sponsored entities"). There was a lot of buzz recently about Fannie and Freddie, but these entities, and ready related, are completely different from those of the Federal Housing Authority.
Recent events in credit markets have made the loan the FHA an affordable solution for real buyers. In fact, it is the opinion of this author that without the availability of this loan, there would be few people buy houses these days.
In mid-December of last year, a report began to circulate among all the direct lenders citing "counties of the market value decline" across the country. This report placed counties in one of three categories: 1) by (depreciation little or no home values), 2) soft (significant depreciation), or 3) distressed (extreme depreciation). Since then, the report, and the consequence Loan guidelines, has been revised and updated.
Where things stand is that lenders mandate a 5% reduction market for low LTV, and a 10% LTV for ailing markets. LTV stands for "loan to value," and refers to the amount Upper funding (as a ratio to the sale price), the lender. For example, if a loan program in a "par" market allowed the financing 90%, the same loan program in a market in distress would only allow the financing of 80%.
Like most counties in large metropolitan areas are on the list, heavy demands are placed on deposit borrowers buying homes in these areas. On average, this means 10% of the requirements payment in par markets, 15% of payment requirements in markets mild and 20% of payment requirements in markets in need.
But this is where FHA loans provide a saving grace, as these loan programs are not subject to this "LTV reduction". Rather, it is not just the government loan programs (ie Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) subject to this constraint. In addition, FHA loans allow up LTV 97.75% (ie 2.25% down payment). On a home $ 450 000 in a soft market, this means that the borrower only has to deposit $ 10 125 instead of $ 67 500 on a loan non-governmental organizations.
The other major advantage of the FHA program has reduced the credit requirements. While non-performing loans government require credit scores of 700 +, the FHA loan accepts credit scores as low as 640.
Is there a jack of all this? A little. The loan carries a mandatory FHA mortgage insurance premium of 1.5% of the loan amount to be paid at settlement on loan $ 400 000, 1.5% would be $ 6,000. This will change to 01.25 to 02.25%, depending on the borrower's financial strength, when the new guidelines FHA is released July 14, 2008.
However, even with the mortgage insurance premium of 1.5%, the total "down payment" required the buyer (2.25% + 1.5% = 3.75%) is lower than a non-governmental program (10% in the best case). Certainly, the additional costs 1.5% is not going towards equity as a deposit, but the total out of pocket costs even less.
Another "catch" the FHA loan is that, assuming the borrower does the 97.75% financing (or at least something over 78%), the borrower must pay mortgage insurance Monthly (MMI). MMI is similar to the PMI (private mortgage insurance on non-government loans). However, payment MMI 0.50% of the loan amount is slightly less than a PMI payment would be for the same loan amount.
But is MMI or PMI really a bad thing? Before January 2007, she was because it was not tax deductible. But as of January 1, 2007, following the "Tax Relief Act and health care of 2006 "which President Bush signed the law, mortgage insurance premiums are now tax deductible. Before this time, buyers willing to finance more than 80% obtained a second mortgage to avoid MMI or PMI (and 2nd mortgages, when used for purchase, are tax deductible). But with the new tax law, the insurance premium mortgage has the same tax benefit as a mortgage second tier. Thus MMI can be considered a "second mortgage".
And finally, another "catch" to the FHA loans is they take a little longer to process. The reason is that there is more paperwork, steps and procedures for the lender to then go through with non-government programs. In total, this means about 10 extra calendar days for the process, so 35-40 days instead of the usual 25-30. What I tell buyers to bid on a house and planning to use FHA financing is to simply request a 40-45 day escrow instead of the usual 30. In this market, with sellers eager to sell, it's never a problem.
And it is "taken" for the FHA loan, but if it is minor not significant in the opinion of the author. Really, the only real thorn in the "pink FHA" is the mortgage insurance premium 1.5%. And for borrowers who have the assets to afford a 15% deposit +, I tell them to use conventional financing, so they can avoid the mortgage insurance premium (and also qualify for a better rate with the largest deposit).
Speaking rate, the player can be considered a monster rate for this loan program of the government. But the rates are actually quite modest. In mid-May, wholesale prices on an FHA loan with 97.75% financing (2.25% down) were about 6.00% against 5.625% for a conventional loan with funding of 80%.
Thus, with 15-20% of the payment requirements of conventional loans for houses in "areas of declining market value", FHA loans are a great resource for buyers unable to afford these important advances. And since the loan limit for FHA was raised as high as $ 729 750 in some regions, the applicability is even broader. Yes, there are some "catch" to this loan program, but overall the benefits outweigh the disadvantages for the borrower with limited assets.
About the Author
Jared Martin is President and CEO of
GOTeHomeLoans, Inc., an Upfront Mortgage Broker Firm serving CA, DC, MD, VA, and PA. Questions and comments can be emailed to Jared at
jaredm@gotehomeloans.com.
FHA loan Upfront Mortgage Insurance Premium?
I am in the process of buying a home through the FHA loan. Anyway, the mortgage insurance premium required If I put down 20% of the cost? If so, instead of adding the premium Insurance on my loan, I can just pay him cash?
If you have 20% to put down, so my question is why you make a FHA loan? Did you know that you can get a better loan rate with another program?
Tags: fha, insurance, mip, Mortgage, mortgage insurance premium fha, mortgage insurance premium fha 2009, mortgage insurance premium fha rate, mortgage insurance premium fha refinance, mortgage insurance premium fha streamline refinance